HOME
 
ON-LINE MOTORING BOOKSHOP
Cars & 4WDs
Motorcycles
Tractors
Boats
DVDs
Motor Sport
Books by Subject
 
AUTOMOTIVE
NEWS
SERVICE
Road Tests
Used Car Reviews
News
Historic Cars
Opinion
Motorcycle
Tests
Boat Tests
 
MARQUE
AUTOMOTIVE
ARCHIVES
Sales Brochures
Photographs
Press Kits
Other Items
 
LINKS

 

marque.com.au
AUTOMOTIVE NEWS SERVICE
OPINION


TWO SETS OF RULES

By MURRAY HUBBARD
19 April 2010

Can you imagine playing a game of football with two sets of rules: one set for one team and a separate set for another? If you can, and you drive a car, that precisely the current state of play. Queensland has just introduced its latest ploy that's claimed to reduce the road toll. Vehicles in mufti parked on a road near you and fitted with speed cameras.

If you're in a car that is doing, for instance, 65 km/h in a 60 km zone you will have your car featured in a Kodak moment and the State Government will even send you a free copy of the photograph. If, however, you are filmed by the same camera a few minutes later, doing the same speed - or a hell of a lot more - and you happen to be riding a motorcycle, they won't send the photograph to you. Or the associated fine.

The reason is that motorcycles have no legal requirement for a front number plate and therefore are unable to be identified. Ah, you say, what about taking the rear end of the bike where there is a number plate? Good thought. Unlike a car where the driver cannot simply put his hand over the number plate, the motor cyclist can - and has done just that - to prevent identification.

(Note: We are not advocating motor cycles should have front number plates.)

So motor cyclists, which in Queensland are represented in a highly disproportionate number of fatal crashes, do not play by the same rules as motorists. Instead of addressing this anomaly the State Government introduced the cameras parking in unmarked vehicles parked on the side of the road to catch the easy targets - mums and dads going about their daily business and driving slightly over the speed limit.

Are these the real culprits causing the fatal crashes? No, but they are responsible, experienced drivers, driving to the prevailing conditions. It can be argued that the new covert cameras may well cause crashes and indeed cause people to speed on other roads.

There is firstly a danger that if people do spot a police camera car they hit the brakes to wash off five kilometres an hour to avoid a hefty fine. We all know what can happen when a car brakes for no apparent reason. Tail enders. And why did the cars tail end - because the driver was firstly distracted looking for the tell-tale flash light on the tow bar of the unmarked police vehicle and braked suddenly when he/she found one.

Secondly, human nature being what it is, this will entice less responsible drivers to crash through the sound barrier on roads where there are no parked cars, lifting the potential for fatal high-speed crashes.

Victoria has had a similar system in place for some time. Did it stop the idiot who killed himself and four of his mates in that state a few months ago? No way. You cannot legislate for stupidity. This latest ploy smacks of nothing more than revenue raising by a state government so broke it has to sell off assets to balance the budget.

Australian state governments are reliant - dare we say addicted - to income from two sources: the hapless, hopeless gamblers addicted to poker machines, and mum and dad motorists - all soft, easy targets.

Even the Queensland Police Union has labelled the new vehicle-based cameras as nothing more than revenue raisers. It is a shotgun approach to road safety which takes away from the real issue: not enough money in the coffers to provide adequate police numbers for all the issues

(Murray Hubbard is the editor of mister-cars.com and can be contacted at mhubbard1@optusnet.com.au)

© Copyright Marque Publishing Company